Why You Should Never Pay a Charge-Off
Uncover the counterintuitive financial implications of paying charged-off debts. Learn why this common action may not be beneficial.
Uncover the counterintuitive financial implications of paying charged-off debts. Learn why this common action may not be beneficial.
A charge-off occurs when a creditor formally recognizes a debt as unlikely to be collected. This action happens after a borrower has failed to make payments for a sustained period, often around 180 days past the due date. The original creditor removes the debt from its active accounts and classifies it as a loss on its financial statements.
Despite being “charged off,” the debt is not forgiven. The borrower still legally owes the money, and the creditor retains the right to pursue collection. The original creditor may continue collection efforts or sell the charged-off debt to a third-party debt buyer for a fraction of its value. These debt buyers then acquire the legal right to collect the full amount from the consumer.
When an account is charged off, it becomes a significant derogatory mark on a consumer’s credit report. This negative entry reflects severe delinquency and the creditor’s decision to classify the debt as uncollectible. The charge-off itself, not the act of paying it, causes the primary and most substantial damage to one’s credit score, potentially reducing it by dozens or even hundreds of points.
A common misconception is that paying a charged-off account will remove it from the credit report or dramatically improve a credit score. This is not the case. The charge-off entry remains on the credit report for up to seven years from the date of the original delinquency. While the status might update to “paid charge-off” or “settled for less than full amount,” the underlying negative event persists.
Credit scoring models consider the charge-off a severe negative event; simply changing its status to “paid” does not erase the initial damage. The impact of a paid charge-off on a credit score is minimal because the primary harm occurred when the account first became delinquent and was subsequently charged off. Future creditors will still see a history of severe delinquency, even if the debt was eventually settled or paid. Expected credit score improvement after paying a charged-off account is far less than consumers anticipate, as the reporting period for the derogatory mark remains unchanged.
After a debt has been charged off, the original creditor may continue collection attempts or sell the debt to a third-party debt buyer. These buyers acquire delinquent accounts at a reduced price and attempt to collect the full amount. When interacting with any debt collector, consumers possess specific rights under federal regulations, such as the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which prohibits abusive, unfair, or deceptive practices.
Consumers can request debt validation within 30 days of receiving initial communication from a collector. This requires the collector to provide proof that the debt is legitimate and they have the legal right to collect it. A written debt validation letter confirms accuracy. Consumers can also send a written cease and desist letter to stop contact, though this does not extinguish the debt or prevent legal action.
The “statute of limitations” (SOL) for debt collection is a state-specific legal timeframe within which a creditor or debt buyer can file a lawsuit. The SOL varies by jurisdiction, typically three to six years, but can be longer. If the SOL has expired, the debt is “time-barred,” meaning a collector cannot successfully sue to collect it.
Making a payment or acknowledging a time-barred debt in writing can, in some jurisdictions, “restart the clock” on the SOL. This “re-aging” can revive the creditor’s legal right to sue, making a consumer vulnerable to a lawsuit for a debt previously uncollectible. Understanding the SOL in one’s state and avoiding actions that could inadvertently reset it is a primary reason for strategically avoiding payment on older debts.
For consumers addressing charged-off debt, various strategic approaches exist beyond simply paying the full amount. One option is to negotiate a settlement for a lesser amount. Debt buyers, having acquired the debt at a significant discount, are often willing to accept 20% to 50% of the original balance. Any settlement agreement should be obtained in writing before making a payment, clearly stating the agreed-upon amount and that it will satisfy the debt in full.
Be aware of the potential tax implications of debt forgiveness. If a creditor forgives or cancels more than $600 of debt, they are required to issue a Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt, to the consumer and the IRS. The forgiven amount may be considered taxable income, unless an exception, such as insolvency, applies. An individual is considered insolvent if their total liabilities exceed their total assets immediately before debt cancellation, potentially allowing them to exclude the cancelled debt from gross income.
Another strategic approach involves allowing the statute of limitations to expire, particularly for older debts. This strategy requires careful monitoring of the applicable SOL and strict avoidance of any actions that could inadvertently reset the clock, such as making a payment or verbally acknowledging the debt. While a time-barred debt cannot typically be collected through a lawsuit, collectors may still attempt to contact the consumer.
Should a debt collector successfully sue and obtain a judgment, the implications can be significant. A judgment grants the creditor legal avenues to collect, including wage garnishment, bank account levies, or placing liens on real property.