Why Is the Social Security Tax Considered Regressive?
Learn why the Social Security tax structure results in high-income individuals paying a smaller percentage of their total annual earnings than other workers.
Learn why the Social Security tax structure results in high-income individuals paying a smaller percentage of their total annual earnings than other workers.
The Social Security tax, a deduction on most pay stubs under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), funds retirement, disability, and survivor benefits for millions of Americans. Despite its purpose, the tax is frequently described as “regressive.” This characterization can be confusing, as it seems to contradict the social safety net goal of the program. Understanding this label requires a closer look at the tax’s structure and its impact on workers at different income levels.
To understand why the Social Security tax is regressive, it is necessary to know the different ways governments levy taxes. Tax systems are categorized into three types based on how the tax rate relates to a person’s income or wealth. Each structure distributes the tax burden differently.
A progressive tax is one where the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases. This means individuals with higher incomes pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes than those with lower incomes. The U.S. federal income tax system is an example of a progressive structure.
A proportional tax, or flat tax, applies the same tax rate to all individuals, regardless of income. In this system, every taxpayer pays an identical percentage of their income. The absolute dollar amount paid still increases with income.
A regressive tax is one where the tax rate effectively decreases as the amount subject to taxation increases. This results in the tax taking a larger percentage of total income from low-income earners than from high-income earners. A sales tax is a common example, as it consumes a larger portion of income from lower-income households who spend more on necessities.
The Social Security tax has a specific set of rules determining how much is paid. For 2025, the tax rate is 6.2% for employees and is matched by a 6.2% contribution from their employers. Self-employed individuals are responsible for both halves, paying a combined rate of 12.4% on their net earnings.
The Social Security tax has an annual wage base limit, which is the maximum amount of earnings subject to the tax in a given year. For 2025, this limit is $176,100. Any wages an individual earns above this amount are not subject to the 6.2% Social Security tax, and this cap is adjusted annually.
This structure is distinct from the Medicare tax. The Medicare tax rate is 1.45% for both employees and employers, but it does not have a wage cap, making it a proportional tax for most earners. An Additional Medicare Tax of 0.9% applies to earnings over $200,000 ($250,000 for married couples), which introduces a progressive element.
The annual wage base limit is the reason the Social Security tax is classified as regressive. By capping the income subject to the tax, the system creates a scenario where the effective tax rate falls as income rises beyond the cap. A comparison of workers illustrates this.
Consider a worker who earns $70,000 in 2025. Since this amount is below the $176,100 wage base limit, their entire salary is subject to the 6.2% tax. The total Social Security tax they pay for the year is $4,340, which is exactly 6.2% of their total annual income.
Now, examine a high-income earner who makes $400,000 in 2025. They only pay the 6.2% Social Security tax on the first $176,100 of their earnings. The maximum tax they contribute is $10,918.20, which represents a much smaller fraction of their total income.
When the $10,918.20 tax payment is calculated as a percentage of their $400,000 salary, the effective tax rate is only about 2.7%. This is much lower than the 6.2% effective rate paid by the worker earning $70,000. The wage cap shelters a significant portion of high earners’ income from this tax.
While the method for collecting Social Security taxes is regressive, the system for paying out benefits is progressive. This creates a counterbalance within the program. The Social Security Administration (SSA) uses a weighted formula to ensure benefits replace a higher proportion of pre-retirement earnings for low-wage workers than for high-wage workers.
The calculation begins with a worker’s “Average Indexed Monthly Earnings” (AIME), an inflation-adjusted average of their 35 highest-earning years. The SSA applies a formula to this AIME to determine the Primary Insurance Amount (PIA), which is the benefit a worker receives at full retirement age. This formula uses “bend points” to apply different replacement rates to portions of a person’s AIME.
For example, the formula replaces a high percentage of the first segment of AIME and lower percentages for subsequent segments of earnings. Because the highest replacement percentage applies to the lowest portion of earnings, individuals with lower lifetime earnings receive a benefit that is a larger percentage of their past income. This progressive benefit formula provides a stronger financial safety net.