Why Are Jumbo Mortgage Rates Lower Than Conventional?
Learn the surprising economic factors driving lower interest rates for jumbo mortgages compared to conventional loans.
Learn the surprising economic factors driving lower interest rates for jumbo mortgages compared to conventional loans.
It might seem counterintuitive that mortgage rates for larger, or “jumbo,” loans can sometimes be lower than those for conventional mortgages. While one might expect a larger loan to carry a higher interest rate due to increased perceived risk, specific dynamics within the mortgage industry contribute to this outcome. This article explores the differences between conventional and jumbo loans, examines how lenders assess and price risks, and discusses the influence of the secondary mortgage market on these varying rates.
Conventional and jumbo loans are primarily distinguished by their adherence to specific loan limits. Conventional loans conform to guidelines set by government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These entities establish maximum loan amounts, known as conforming loan limits, adjusted annually by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) to reflect changes in average home prices. For 2025, the baseline conforming loan limit for a single-unit property in most areas is $806,500, extending up to $1,209,750 in designated high-cost areas.
Conventional loans meeting these criteria are “conforming” and eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This makes them standardized products, readily tradable in the secondary mortgage market. The standardization and liquidity provided by the GSEs allow lenders to originate these loans with the understanding that they can be sold, replenishing funds to issue new mortgages.
Jumbo loans, conversely, exceed these conforming loan limits. Because they surpass the maximum amounts eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, jumbo loans are classified as “non-conforming.” Private lenders originate and typically hold these larger loans in their own portfolios, or sell them to specialized private investors, rather than to the GSEs. This non-conforming nature fundamentally influences their underwriting requirements and pricing.
Lenders evaluate the risk associated with conventional and jumbo loans differently, directly impacting pricing strategies. While jumbo loans involve a larger principal, qualified borrowers typically present a lower credit risk profile. This reduced risk often enables lenders to offer more competitive interest rates for jumbo mortgages.
Underwriting criteria for jumbo loans are notably stringent compared to conventional loans. Jumbo mortgage borrowers often need higher credit scores, frequently 700 to 720 or above, contrasting with conventional loans that may accept scores as low as 620. A higher credit score signifies a borrower’s consistent history of managing financial obligations responsibly, reducing the likelihood of default.
Jumbo loan applicants are also required to demonstrate lower debt-to-income (DTI) ratios. While conventional loans may permit DTI ratios up to 45% or even 50%, jumbo lenders generally prefer a DTI ratio no higher than 43%, often ideally 36% or less. A lower DTI ratio indicates a smaller portion of the borrower’s monthly income is allocated to debt payments, providing more financial flexibility to handle a large mortgage. This financial stability is a key factor in a lender’s risk assessment.
Jumbo loans also necessitate significantly larger cash reserves and higher down payments. Borrowers may need cash reserves equivalent to six to twelve months or more of mortgage payments after closing, ensuring they can cover expenses during unforeseen circumstances. Down payment requirements commonly range from 10% to 25% or more, sometimes as high as 40% of the property’s value.
These substantial liquid assets and equity contributions provide additional security for the lender, mitigating potential losses. The rigorous qualification process allows lenders to underwrite these larger mortgages with greater confidence. This thorough vetting of financially robust borrowers contributes to the perception of jumbo loans as a safer investment, leading to more favorable interest rates.
The secondary mortgage market significantly influences interest rates for both conventional and jumbo loans. This market is where mortgage loans and their servicing rights are bought and sold between lenders and investors, often bundled into mortgage-backed securities (MBS). It provides liquidity to lenders, allowing them to free up capital to originate new loans.
For conventional loans, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are major secondary market participants. They purchase conforming mortgages from originators, standardize them, and package them into MBS sold to investors. This robust market means lenders can quickly sell these assets, reducing risk exposure and capital requirements. The GSEs also introduce guarantee fees (G-fees) for their backing, which contribute to the overall cost of a conventional loan and impact its interest rate.
Jumbo loans, by contrast, cannot be sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac because they exceed conforming loan limits. Consequently, lenders originating jumbo loans must either retain them in their own portfolios or sell them to private investors specializing in non-conforming mortgages. Holding loans in a lender’s portfolio requires allocating capital as a reserve against potential losses, in accordance with regulatory capital requirements. The risk weights for mortgages held in portfolio can vary based on factors like loan-to-value ratios.
Despite the need for capital allocation, many large banks are willing to hold jumbo loans in their portfolios. These financial institutions often view jumbo borrowers as high-net-worth clients who may seek additional banking services, such as investment management or private banking.
By offering competitive rates on jumbo mortgages, lenders can attract and retain these valuable clients, fostering broader and more profitable relationships. This strategic interest in cultivating relationships with affluent borrowers, coupled with the absence of GSE guarantee fees, can contribute to jumbo loan rates being lower than those of conventional loans.