What Is the Purpose of Risk Sharing With Providers?
Explore the core reasons behind healthcare risk sharing, a payment model designed to optimize system efficiency and patient value.
Explore the core reasons behind healthcare risk sharing, a payment model designed to optimize system efficiency and patient value.
Risk sharing with providers involves healthcare providers assuming a portion of the financial responsibility for the cost and quality of patient care, alongside payers like insurance companies or government programs. Unlike the traditional fee-for-service model, where providers are reimbursed for each service rendered regardless of outcome, risk sharing ties financial incentives to patient health, efficiency, and overall cost management. This approach encourages providers to focus on comprehensive care, from preventive services to complex treatments.
A primary purpose of risk sharing is to realign financial incentives within the healthcare system, moving away from a volume-driven fee-for-service model. Under fee-for-service, providers are paid for the quantity of services, which can inadvertently incentivize more tests and procedures, even if not always necessary. This traditional model often penalizes providers financially for keeping patients healthy, as fewer services mean less revenue.
In contrast, risk sharing models, such as those seen in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) or bundled payments, encourage providers to deliver care that is both high-quality and cost-effective. Providers can receive a portion of the savings generated by meeting specific cost and quality benchmarks. This motivates them to consider the total cost of care over a patient’s treatment journey or for a defined population. Providers are incentivized to make decisions that lead to better patient outcomes with efficient resource utilization, rather than simply increasing the number of services performed.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) promotes this shift through initiatives like the Quality Payment Program. These programs adjust payments based on measures of quality and cost, compelling providers to focus on the value of care. Risk adjustment models are used to fairly compensate providers by accounting for differences in patient health status and expected care costs, ensuring that providers caring for sicker populations are not financially disadvantaged. This framework rewards providers who manage care effectively, promoting a system where financial success is tied to patient well-being and efficient care delivery.
Risk sharing arrangements foster collaboration and communication among diverse healthcare providers involved in a patient’s treatment. When providers share financial responsibility, they are incentivized to work together to optimize patient management. This collaborative approach aims to eliminate fragmented care, where different specialists might operate in silos, potentially leading to redundant tests or unnecessary procedures.
The shared financial stake encourages a more holistic view of patient care, prompting providers to coordinate services across various settings, including physician offices, hospitals, and post-acute care facilities. For example, bundled payment models provide a single payment for all services related to a specific episode of care, encouraging providers to standardize protocols and decisions to achieve better outcomes within a set budget. This promotes efficiency by reducing waste and ensuring that patients receive the right care at the right time.
Effective care coordination, driven by these models, can reduce the risk of medical errors, such as missed diagnoses or medication mix-ups. By facilitating the sharing of patient information and treatment plans among the care team, it streamlines processes and enhances the overall patient experience. This focus on integrated care ensures that resources are used more efficiently, contributing to a more streamlined and effective healthcare delivery system.
Risk sharing is a mechanism to manage and control the costs within the healthcare system, benefiting payers like insurance companies and government programs, and ultimately, patients. By transferring a portion of financial risk to providers, these models incentivize them to deliver care more cost-effectively. This contrasts sharply with fee-for-service, which has been criticized for contributing to healthcare inflation by rewarding volume over value.
Under risk-sharing agreements, providers become accountable for the total cost of care for their patient populations, encouraging them to identify and eliminate wasteful spending. Studies have indicated that increased financial risk sharing can lead to a decrease in the total cost of care, with some reports showing reductions in overall healthcare spending and pharmacy costs. For instance, patients treated by providers in risk-sharing models may experience lower out-of-pocket costs compared to those in traditional models.
This financial accountability encourages providers to invest in preventive care and chronic disease management, which can avert more expensive interventions like hospitalizations or emergency room visits. The shift helps ensure the long-term affordability of healthcare by promoting efficient resource allocation and sustainable spending patterns. By aligning provider incentives with cost containment, risk sharing contributes to a healthcare system that is more financially viable and responsive to budgetary pressures.
The ultimate objective of risk sharing with providers is to improve the health and well-being of patients. By linking provider reimbursement to quality metrics and patient outcomes, these models compel healthcare professionals to prioritize effective care. This shift encourages a focus on preventive services, early disease detection, and comprehensive management of chronic conditions, aiming to keep patients healthier and out of the hospital.
Providers are motivated to ensure patients receive appropriate and timely care, reducing the likelihood of complications and readmissions. For example, Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are designed to improve patient health outcomes by coordinating care and managing costs for defined patient groups. This incentivizes providers to invest in care coordination and patient engagement strategies that lead to better clinical results.
The emphasis on value over volume means providers are rewarded for achieving better health outcomes, rather than simply performing more procedures. This includes improvements in clinical results, fewer adverse events, and enhanced patient satisfaction. Through risk-sharing arrangements, the healthcare system moves toward a model where financial success is intrinsically tied to the delivery of high-quality, patient-centered care.