What Is the Percentage of Sales Method?
Learn the percentage of sales method, a financial forecasting technique. Project future financial statements by understanding how sales impact various accounts.
Learn the percentage of sales method, a financial forecasting technique. Project future financial statements by understanding how sales impact various accounts.
The percentage of sales method is a financial forecasting technique used by businesses to project future financial statement items. It relies on the premise that many financial accounts maintain a consistent relationship with sales volume. This method helps estimate the financial implications of sales growth for high-level planning. By analyzing historical sales data, businesses can anticipate future resource needs and financial outcomes. It is particularly useful for short-term financial outlooks and for businesses with stable sales patterns where relationships between sales and expenses are predictable.
The fundamental concept behind the percentage of sales method is that certain financial statement accounts have a proportional relationship with sales, while others do not. This categorizes accounts into “variable” and “fixed” components. Variable accounts change directly in proportion to sales volume; as sales increase, these accounts increase, and as sales decrease, they decrease. This proportionality often arises because more sales necessitate greater inputs or activities tied to production and selling.
Conversely, fixed accounts generally remain constant regardless of changes in sales volume within a relevant operating range. Fixed costs are often associated with basic operational capacity, such as rent or machinery, which do not change day-to-day based on sales fluctuations. Understanding this distinction is foundational for accurately applying the method, as it dictates how each account is projected.
Applying the percentage of sales method involves identifying which specific accounts on the income statement and balance sheet behave as variable or fixed components relative to sales.
On the income statement, Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) is a primary variable account, representing direct costs like raw materials and direct labor that increase with higher sales volumes. Sales commissions also typically vary with sales, as they are often a percentage of revenue generated. On the balance sheet, current assets like Accounts Receivable and Inventory are generally considered variable. Increased sales often lead to more credit sales, raising accounts receivable, and greater demand requires holding more inventory. Accounts Payable can also be variable as it relates to purchasing raw materials or goods that scale with sales.
In contrast, fixed components include Property, Plant, and Equipment (PPE), which are long-term assets not directly tied to immediate sales fluctuations. Administrative salaries and rent are common fixed expenses, incurred regardless of sales volume. Common stock and retained earnings on the balance sheet are also generally treated as fixed in short-term sales forecasting, as they do not spontaneously adjust with sales changes. The determination of these percentages relies heavily on historical financial data and informed managerial judgment.
Forecasting using the percentage of sales method begins with projecting future sales, which serves as the foundation. This projection is typically derived from market research, economic outlooks, and a company’s internal growth targets. Once future sales are estimated, the next step involves calculating the historical percentage of sales for each variable income statement and balance sheet account. For example, a business determines what percentage of past sales was represented by Cost of Goods Sold or Accounts Receivable.
These historical percentages are then applied to the projected future sales figure to forecast the values for all variable accounts. If, historically, Cost of Goods Sold was 60% of sales, and projected sales are $1 million, then forecasted Cost of Goods Sold would be $600,000. For fixed accounts, such as Property, Plant & Equipment or administrative salaries, projections are made independently, often based on planned capital expenditures, depreciation schedules, or existing contractual obligations.
After all variable and fixed accounts are projected, pro forma financial statements, including an income statement and balance sheet, are constructed. The final step involves determining any external financing needs or surplus cash. If projected assets exceed projected liabilities and equity, it indicates a need for additional external funding to support anticipated sales growth. Conversely, if liabilities and equity exceed assets, it suggests a surplus of cash.
The results derived from a percentage of sales forecast offer insights into a company’s financial trajectory, particularly its funding requirements. A projected need for external financing suggests anticipated sales growth will outpace internally generated funds. This highlights a potential funding gap management must address, possibly through securing loans or attracting new equity investments. Conversely, a projected surplus of cash indicates internal funds are sufficient to support growth, potentially allowing for debt reduction, dividends, or further investments.
The accuracy and applicability of this method depend on several underlying assumptions. A primary assumption is that historical relationships between sales and certain accounts will remain stable. This implies that cost structure and asset utilization efficiency will not significantly change with increased sales.
Another assumption is that the company is not operating at full capacity. If the business is already at its maximum operational output, an increase in sales would necessitate acquiring new fixed assets, which the basic percentage of sales method might not fully capture without additional adjustments.
Furthermore, the method assumes projected sales growth falls within a “relevant range” where existing cost structures and asset relationships hold true. Significant deviations in sales volume, either much higher or much lower than historical levels, could invalidate the proportional relationships assumed. While this method provides a quick forecast, understanding these assumptions is crucial for interpreting its results and recognizing its limitations.