What Is IRC 671 and How Does It Apply to Trust Taxation?
Understand how IRC 671 impacts trust taxation, including key provisions, tax implications, and reporting requirements for different types of trusts.
Understand how IRC 671 impacts trust taxation, including key provisions, tax implications, and reporting requirements for different types of trusts.
The U.S. tax code includes specific rules for how trusts are taxed, and one key provision is IRC 671. This section determines who is responsible for paying taxes on trust income, affecting estate planning and asset management strategies. Understanding its application is important for grantors, trustees, and beneficiaries.
IRC 671 determines how income, deductions, and credits of certain trusts are reported for tax purposes. It applies when the grantor or another individual retains control over the trust in a way that makes them responsible for its tax obligations. Instead of the trust being taxed as a separate entity, the income is attributed to the individual holding these powers, treating the trust as an extension of their personal finances.
A trust falls under IRC 671 when the grantor or another party retains control over key aspects such as revocation, distributions, or investments. If these powers exist, the IRS disregards the trust as a separate taxpayer, and all income, deductions, and credits flow to the individual, who reports them on their personal tax return. This treatment allows income to be taxed at the individual’s rate rather than the typically higher trust tax rates.
IRC 671 establishes that when certain powers over a trust are retained, the tax liability stays with the individual holding those powers. This determination is based on multiple factors rather than a single condition.
The section interacts with the broader grantor trust rules in IRC 672 through 679, which outline specific powers that trigger grantor trust status. For example, if the grantor retains the ability to substitute assets of equivalent value, often called a “swap power,” the trust is disregarded for tax purposes. Similarly, if the grantor can borrow from the trust without adequate interest or security, the IRS attributes the trust’s income to the grantor.
Deductions and credits related to the trust’s income must be reported on the grantor’s individual tax return. This can create tax planning opportunities, particularly if the grantor’s tax situation allows for more favorable treatment of deductions.
Trusts normally distribute income among beneficiaries to take advantage of lower tax rates. However, under IRC 671, income remains tied to the grantor, preventing tax obligations from being spread across multiple individuals. This restriction can influence estate planning strategies aimed at minimizing tax burdens.
A trust’s classification as a grantor or non-grantor trust determines who is responsible for reporting and paying taxes on its income. Grantor trusts are directly tied to the individual who created them, while non-grantor trusts operate as separate tax entities.
A grantor trust is one where the person who established it retains certain powers or benefits that cause the trust’s income to be taxed directly to them. These powers, outlined in IRC 672 through 679, include revocation rights, control over distributions, or the ability to borrow from the trust without security. Because the IRS disregards the trust as a separate taxpayer, all income, deductions, and credits flow through to the grantor’s personal tax return.
A common example is a revocable living trust. Since the grantor maintains full control over the assets and can modify or dissolve the trust, all income is reported on their individual tax return using Form 1040. This structure allows flexibility in estate planning but does not offer immediate tax benefits, as the grantor remains responsible for all tax liabilities.
Another example is an intentionally defective grantor trust (IDGT), used in estate planning to freeze asset values for gift and estate tax purposes. While the trust’s income is taxed to the grantor, assets within the trust can appreciate outside of the grantor’s taxable estate, helping transfer wealth to heirs while minimizing estate tax exposure.
A non-grantor trust is treated as a separate tax entity, meaning it must report and pay taxes on its own income. The grantor does not retain sufficient control to trigger IRC 671, so the trust must file its own tax return using Form 1041. Trusts reach the highest federal tax bracket (37%) at just $15,200 of taxable income in 2024, compared to $609,350 for single filers.
One advantage of a non-grantor trust is the ability to distribute income to beneficiaries, potentially reducing the overall tax burden. When income is distributed, it is generally taxed at the beneficiary’s individual rate rather than the trust’s higher tax rate. The distributable net income (DNI) rules under IRC 643 ensure that income is only taxed once—either at the trust level or by the beneficiary.
A common example is an irrevocable trust, where the grantor relinquishes control over the assets. These trusts are used for asset protection, charitable giving, or estate tax planning. Because the grantor no longer owns the assets, they are removed from their taxable estate, reducing estate tax liabilities. However, the trust must comply with complex tax reporting requirements and may be subject to additional taxes, such as the net investment income tax (NIIT) of 3.8% on certain types of income.
When a trust is classified as a grantor trust under IRC 671, all income, deductions, and credits are reported on the grantor’s personal tax return. Since the trust does not pay taxes, any taxable income—whether from interest, dividends, rent, or capital gains—is taxed at the grantor’s individual rates.
Certain planning strategies leverage this tax treatment to shift wealth without triggering gift tax consequences. For example, a grantor can sell appreciating assets to an IDGT in exchange for a promissory note without recognizing capital gains, as the IRS does not consider transactions between a grantor and their own trust taxable events. This allows assets to grow outside the grantor’s estate while the grantor continues paying income taxes, effectively reducing their taxable estate over time.
Non-grantor trusts must file their own tax returns and pay taxes on income that is not distributed to beneficiaries. Trusts are subject to compressed tax brackets, reaching the highest federal tax rate of 37% at just $15,200 of taxable income.
To mitigate these high tax rates, trustees often distribute income to beneficiaries, who are typically taxed at lower individual rates. The DNI rules under IRC 643 ensure that income is only taxed once—either at the trust level or by the beneficiary. If income is retained within the trust, it is taxed at the trust’s rates, but if distributed, the tax liability shifts to the recipient. Capital gains, however, are usually taxed at the trust level unless specifically allocated to beneficiaries under the trust agreement. Additionally, non-grantor trusts may be subject to the 3.8% NIIT on passive income.
Grantor trusts do not file a separate tax return in the traditional sense. Instead, the trustee provides the grantor with a statement detailing the trust’s income, deductions, and credits, which the grantor reports on their personal tax return. This is typically done using a grantor trust letter or an attachment to Form 1041, marked as “for informational purposes only.”
Non-grantor trusts must file Form 1041 annually to report income, deductions, and distributions. If income is distributed to beneficiaries, the trust issues Schedule K-1 to each recipient, detailing their share of taxable income. Beneficiaries then report this income on their personal tax returns.
Recent legislative updates have increased scrutiny on grantor trusts used for estate planning, particularly those designed to minimize estate tax exposure. The IRS has signaled potential regulatory changes that could limit the effectiveness of certain strategies, such as sales to IDGTs without recognizing capital gains.
Some states have also revised their tax rules to impose income taxes on trusts based on factors such as the residency of trustees or beneficiaries. For example, California has pursued taxation of out-of-state trusts with California-based beneficiaries, arguing that the presence of a beneficiary in the state creates sufficient tax nexus.
Many assume that all trusts are taxed separately from their creators, but IRC 671 makes it clear that grantor trusts are treated as extensions of the grantor for tax purposes. Another misconception is that grantor trust status is permanent. A revocable trust, for example, becomes irrevocable upon the grantor’s death, transitioning to a non-grantor trust that must file its own tax returns. Understanding these distinctions is important for long-term estate and tax planning.