Accounting Concepts and Practices

What Is Cost Share and How Does It Work?

Grasp the core principles of cost share, understanding its role in leveraging resources and fostering collaborative success.

Cost share represents a portion of a project’s total expenses not covered by the primary funding source, typically a grant-making agency. This financial or non-financial contribution comes from the applicant organization or another external party. It signifies a shared investment in a project, illustrating a commitment to its success beyond the direct funding provided by a sponsor. This concept encourages collaboration and resource leveraging.

Understanding Cost Share

Cost share, also known as matching funds, involves resources an applicant contributes to a sponsored project beyond the amount directly funded by the sponsor. This arrangement commits to using funds or resources from other sources to achieve project objectives. Its purpose is to foster shared commitment, leverage additional resources, and demonstrate a stakeholder’s investment. This shared responsibility ensures multiple parties have a vested interest in the project’s outcomes, potentially increasing its impact and sustainability.

Cost share can be either mandatory or voluntary. Mandatory cost sharing is explicitly required by the funding agency as a condition for receiving an award, with requirements detailed in the application guidelines. If a proposal with mandatory cost share is accepted, the commitment becomes a binding obligation. Voluntary cost sharing occurs when an applicant offers resources even if the sponsor does not require it, often to enhance proposal competitiveness. Once quantified and committed in a proposal, especially for federal awards, voluntary cost sharing also becomes a binding and auditable requirement.

Cost share signifies that a project has broader institutional or community support, which may increase its likelihood of success. Funding agencies often view cost share as evidence that a recipient is not solely reliant on external funds, but possesses internal capacity and dedication. This collaborative funding model enhances financial integrity and encourages responsible resource management. It also helps distribute financial risk, making large-scale projects more feasible by pooling diverse funding streams.

Common Applications

Cost share arrangements are common in grant funding and government programs. Non-profit organizations frequently encounter cost share requirements when seeking grants for community development, social services, or environmental initiatives. For example, a non-profit applying for a federal grant to build a new community center might need to secure a portion of construction costs from local donors or its own reserves. This demonstrates local investment and commitment to the project’s long-term viability.

Research institutions and universities regularly participate in cost share for scientific research grants. Federal agencies, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the National Science Foundation (NSF), often expect universities to contribute to the overall cost of research projects. This might involve faculty salaries, laboratory equipment, or facility usage not directly billed to the grant. The university’s contribution signifies its dedication to advancing the research and leveraging its existing infrastructure.

Government programs at state and local levels also use cost share to fund public works, infrastructure improvements, and specialized services. A state department of transportation, for instance, might offer a cost share program where local municipalities contribute a percentage of costs for road or bridge construction projects. This ensures local ownership and financial participation in projects that directly benefit their communities. Similarly, health and human services programs might require local agencies to provide matching funds or in-kind contributions for services delivered to specific populations. In all these applications, cost share extends the reach of available funds and fosters collaborative partnerships.

Methods of Contribution

Cost share can be provided through several methods, encompassing both direct financial outlays and non-cash contributions.

Cash contributions involve direct financial outlays from the recipient organization’s own funds or from third-party donors. This might include salaries and fringe benefits for personnel dedicated to the project but not charged to the sponsor, or the purchase of equipment and supplies necessary for the project. Cash contributions are straightforward to track as they involve actual monetary transactions recorded in accounting systems.

In-kind contributions represent non-cash resources that have a quantifiable value. These can include volunteer time, donated equipment, facilities, or services provided at no charge. For example, a project might utilize donated office space, the fair rental value of which can count as an in-kind contribution. Professional services offered pro bono by experts, such as legal or accounting advice, can also be valued and included as in-kind cost share. These contributions are important for projects, especially for non-profit organizations, as they leverage existing community assets and expertise.

Third-party contributions involve resources provided by an entity other than the direct recipient or the primary funding agency. This can include cash or in-kind support from partner organizations, subrecipients, or individuals. For instance, another non-profit or a local business might donate supplies or provide staff time to support a project.

Valuation and Documentation

Accurate valuation and thorough documentation are important for all forms of cost share, ensuring compliance with funding requirements and facilitating successful audits. Every cost share contribution must be verifiable from the recipient’s records and directly tied to the project’s objectives. This record-keeping is as important as documenting direct expenditures charged to the award.

Valuing non-cash contributions, such as in-kind services or donated goods, requires specific guidelines. Volunteer hours, for instance, are valued at a rate consistent with what would be paid for similar work in the local labor market, not necessarily the volunteer’s professional rate unless their specialized skills are directly applied to the project. Organizations like Independent Sector publish national and state-specific values for volunteer time, which can serve as a reference point. The valuation should reflect the fair market value of the services or items at the time of donation.

For donated equipment or the use of facilities, the valuation should not exceed the fair market value and must be prorated based on the portion of its use dedicated to the project. If space is donated, its value is typically based on the fair rental value of comparable space. All cost-shared expenses must meet the same allowability criteria as direct costs, meaning they must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable to the project, and not included as contributions for any other federal award.

Proper documentation includes maintaining detailed records such as time logs for volunteer efforts, invoices or appraisals for donated goods, and written commitments from third parties. These records must clearly describe the contribution, its value, and its direct relevance to the project. Failure to adequately document cost share commitments can lead to audit findings and potentially require the return of funds to the sponsor. Therefore, robust internal controls and clear processes for tracking and reporting cost share are necessary.

Previous

How Long Does a Credit Card Payment Take to Process?

Back to Accounting Concepts and Practices
Next

Who Is the Sender/Drawer on a Money Order?