What Does IBOR Stand For & Why Was It Replaced?
Understand the evolution of key financial benchmarks, why a central rate was replaced, and what new standards now govern global finance.
Understand the evolution of key financial benchmarks, why a central rate was replaced, and what new standards now govern global finance.
Interbank offered rates have long been foundational in the global financial system, influencing a vast array of financial products and transactions. These rates serve as benchmarks, providing a standardized measure for the cost of borrowing between financial institutions. Understanding their function and recent changes is important for navigating the financial landscape.
The acronym IBOR stands for Interbank Offered Rate. This term refers to a benchmark interest rate at which major global banks historically offered to lend to one another in the international interbank market for short-term, unsecured loans. The London Interbank Offered Rate, commonly known as LIBOR, was the most widely recognized IBOR.
The core purpose of an IBOR was to provide a transparent and consistent reference point for the cost of borrowing. This rate became embedded in countless financial contracts and products worldwide, from consumer loans to complex derivatives, making it a central pillar for pricing and valuation.
The determination of an IBOR, such as LIBOR, involved a daily process where a panel of major banks submitted their estimated borrowing rates. Each bank reported the rate at which it believed it could borrow funds from other banks for various currencies and maturities. A calculation agent compiled these rates and employed a “trimmed mean” methodology. This process involved discarding a percentage of the highest and lowest submissions to remove outliers, then averaging the remaining rates to produce the official daily IBOR.
IBORs had a broad impact across the financial system, influencing a wide range of products. These included adjustable-rate mortgages, student loans, corporate loans, and various derivatives like interest rate swaps. The rate also served as an indicator of liquidity and overall health within the banking system.
A significant transition away from IBORs, particularly LIBOR, began due to concerns about their integrity and reliability. Revelations emerged in 2012 regarding manipulative practices, where some panel banks falsely reported their borrowing costs. This manipulation occurred to benefit trading positions or create a misleading impression of financial health, especially during the 2008 financial crisis.
Beyond the manipulation scandals, the volume of actual interbank lending transactions underpinning the IBORs significantly decreased. This decline meant rates were increasingly based on expert judgment rather than actual market activity, raising questions about their representativeness. Regulators worldwide, including the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the US Federal Reserve, recognized the need for more robust and transparent benchmarks.
The global effort to replace IBORs reflected a push for benchmarks less susceptible to manipulation and more reflective of genuine market conditions. The aim was to move towards rates grounded in actual, observable transactions, fostering greater trust and stability in financial markets.
The financial industry has transitioned to new reference rates, often called Risk-Free Rates (RFRs), to replace former IBORs. These new benchmarks are more robust, transparent, and less prone to manipulation than their predecessors. RFRs are based on actual, observable transactions, rather than estimated submissions.
Prominent examples include the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) for U.S. dollars, the Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA) for British pounds, and the Euro Short-Term Rate (€STR) for euros. SOFR reflects the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities in the repurchase (repo) market. SONIA is based on actual overnight unsecured sterling deposit transactions, while €STR reflects wholesale euro unsecured overnight borrowing costs.
These RFRs are generally overnight rates and are published in arrears, meaning the rate for a given day is known the following business day. This backward-looking nature, combined with their transaction-based methodology, provides a more reliable and auditable foundation for financial contracts. The shift to these new benchmarks aims to enhance the integrity and resilience of the global financial system.