What Are the 10 Generally Accepted Auditing Standards?
Explore the core standards governing an auditor's qualifications, the execution of their work, and the communication of their findings.
Explore the core standards governing an auditor's qualifications, the execution of their work, and the communication of their findings.
Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) represent a foundational set of principles that guide auditors in their work. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) first established these standards to bring a standardized approach to a profession that previously lacked uniform practices. This framework provides the basis for auditors to ensure financial statements are accurate and internal controls are effective.
The first set of standards governs the auditor’s professional qualifications and the overall quality of their work. These principles focus on the character and competency of the auditor, establishing a baseline of professionalism. These standards ensure that auditors are prepared for their responsibilities and approach their work with the appropriate mindset.
A core requirement is that auditors must possess adequate technical training and proficiency. This expertise must be rooted in formal education and substantial experience in both accounting and auditing. This proficiency is not a one-time achievement but requires continuous professional education to stay current with evolving accounting principles, industry-specific practices, and new auditing techniques. An auditor must have this foundation to navigate a company’s financial systems and make informed judgments.
Another general standard is maintaining independence in mental attitude in all matters related to the audit engagement. This principle requires an auditor to be impartial and objective. This extends beyond avoiding financial conflicts of interest; it demands an unbiased mindset, free from any client pressures that could compromise the audit’s integrity. The auditor must be independent in both fact and appearance, meaning they must be objective and also be seen as objective by the public.
Finally, auditors are required to exercise due professional care in the planning and performance of the audit and the preparation of the report. This standard obligates auditors to be diligent, thorough, and skeptical throughout the entire audit process. It involves a critical assessment of audit evidence and a thoughtful consideration of the judgments made. Acting with due professional care means the auditor is actively engaged in a rigorous manner to fulfill their responsibilities.
The standards of field work provide the guidelines for the actual execution of an audit. These standards move from the auditor’s qualifications to the practical steps involved in gathering evidence and evaluating a company’s financial reporting. They dictate how an audit should be planned, conducted, and supervised to ensure a thorough examination.
Proper planning and supervision are the starting point for any audit. The auditor must develop a comprehensive audit strategy that outlines the scope, timing, and direction of the audit. This plan is not static and must be updated as necessary in response to findings. If assistants are part of the audit team, they must be properly supervised to ensure they are performing their work competently and in line with the audit plan.
A sufficient understanding of the entity and its environment, including its internal control, is required to properly assess risk. An auditor must comprehend a business’s operations, its industry, and the external factors that affect it. A part of this is evaluating the company’s system of internal controls—the policies designed to prevent or detect significant financial misstatements. This understanding allows the auditor to identify areas with a higher risk of error or fraud and to design audit procedures accordingly.
The goal of field work is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to form a reasonable basis for an opinion. “Sufficiency” refers to the quantity of evidence gathered, while “appropriateness” speaks to its quality, meaning its relevance and reliability. Evidence can come in many forms, including reviewing internal documents, confirming balances with third parties, observing inventory counts, and performing analytical procedures. This evidence provides the support for the auditor’s final conclusions.
The standards of reporting govern the content and presentation of the auditor’s final report, which is the primary communication to the public. These standards ensure that the audit’s conclusions are conveyed clearly and unambiguously to users of the financial statements, such as investors and creditors.
The auditor’s report must explicitly state whether the financial statements are presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GAAP is the common set of accounting rules that companies must follow when preparing their financial statements. This standard requires the auditor to make a definitive statement on this conformity, which serves as a baseline for users to understand the framework used.
The report must also identify any circumstances in which accounting principles have not been consistently applied in the current period compared to the preceding period. Consistency is important because it allows for meaningful comparisons of financial data over time. If a company changes an accounting method, such as how it values inventory, it can impact the reported financial results. The auditor has a duty to highlight such changes to prevent users from being misled by shifts in financial position that are due to accounting changes rather than business performance.
Informative disclosures in the financial statements are considered adequate unless the auditor’s report states otherwise. Financial statements include notes that provide additional detail and context. The auditor must call out situations where these disclosures are insufficient. If crucial information is omitted or presented in a misleading way, the auditor must bring this to the attention of readers.
The report must contain an expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements as a whole, or an assertion that an opinion cannot be expressed. An unqualified, or “clean,” opinion states that the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with GAAP. Other types of opinions include a qualified opinion (for a limited scope issue or GAAP departure), an adverse opinion (if statements are materially misstated), or a disclaimer of opinion (if the auditor cannot form an opinion).
While the ten Generally Accepted Auditing Standards provide a foundational framework, they have been integrated into a more comprehensive set of guidelines. The original ten standards are no longer cited as the standalone authority in audit engagements. Instead, they have been superseded by more detailed pronouncements that elaborate on their core principles, reflecting the complexity of modern business.
Today, auditing standards in the United States are set by two primary bodies. For audits of publicly traded companies, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) establishes the standards, a direct result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. For audits of private companies and non-profit organizations, the Auditing Standards Board (ASB) of the AICPA continues to issue the guiding standards.
Although the original ten standards are no longer the direct source of guidance, their underlying principles remain embedded in the current, more detailed frameworks of both the PCAOB and the ASB. The concepts of auditor competence, independence, due care, proper planning, sufficient evidence, and clear reporting are still the foundation of modern auditing. They continue to shape the integrity of financial audits, ensuring the profession upholds its commitment to public trust.