Methods Used to Determine Fair Market Value
Understand how fair market value is established for various assets using accepted methodologies and learn the documentation required to support a valuation.
Understand how fair market value is established for various assets using accepted methodologies and learn the documentation required to support a valuation.
Determining the value of an asset is a frequent necessity for tax and business matters. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) defines this value, known as Fair Market Value (FMV), as the price at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller. This assumes neither party is under any compulsion to complete the transaction and both have reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts. This standard is used for various tax situations, including estate and gift taxes and charitable contributions, with the goal of arriving at a price that a knowledgeable and unforced buyer and seller would agree upon.
The market approach determines an asset’s value by comparing it to identical or similar assets that have recently been sold. This widely used method is most effective when there is an active market with sufficient data on comparable transactions. It relies on the principle of substitution; a buyer would not pay more for an asset than what it would cost to acquire a similar one.
For real estate, this method involves finding “comparable sales” or “comps,” which are recently sold properties in the same geographic area that share similar characteristics. An appraiser analyzes these comps and makes adjustments to account for differences in features like square footage, age, and condition. For example, if a comparable property has a renovated kitchen and the subject property does not, an adjustment would be made to the comp’s sale price to better align it with the subject property’s value.
The application is most straightforward for publicly traded stocks, where the FMV is the average of the high and low trading prices on the specific valuation date. For personal property such as art, antiques, or classic cars, the market approach relies on recent auction results or established price guides from reputable dealers.
For a business, this might involve using valuation multiples, such as a multiple of revenue or earnings, derived from the sales of similar private or public companies. The analyst must then select an appropriate multiple from the range indicated by the comps and apply it to the subject company’s financials to estimate its value.
The income approach is a valuation method centered on the income-generating capability of an asset. It is most suitable for assets like commercial real estate or established businesses that produce a consistent stream of cash flow. The principle is that an asset’s value is the present value of the future income it is expected to generate.
One primary technique is the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method. The DCF method involves creating detailed projections of a company’s future cash flows over a period of several years. These projected cash flows are then discounted back to their present value using a discount rate that reflects the risk associated with achieving those future flows.
A simpler variation is the Capitalization of Earnings method. This technique is best suited for mature, stable businesses with a history of predictable earnings. It calculates value by taking a single, representative period’s earnings and dividing it by a capitalization rate, which reflects the risk and expected growth of the earnings stream.
Choosing between these two methods depends on the stability of the asset’s income. The DCF method is more dynamic and complex, allowing for detailed assumptions about future growth, but its accuracy depends on the quality of the financial forecasts. The Capitalization of Earnings method is more straightforward but assumes historical earnings will continue at a steady rate.
The asset-based approach establishes value based on the cost of a company’s assets minus its liabilities. This method answers the question of what it would cost to recreate the business from the ground up. This approach is often used for holding companies, in liquidation scenarios, or to establish a “floor” value for an operating business.
A common variation is the adjusted net book value method. This process begins with the company’s balance sheet, which lists assets at their historical cost less depreciation. The valuator then adjusts these book values to reflect their current fair market value, such as appraising real estate owned by the company.
Another method is determining the cost to replace the asset. This is relevant for tangible assets like machinery or specialized equipment. The valuation focuses on the current cost to acquire or construct a new asset with similar utility, which is then adjusted downward to account for the depreciation or obsolescence of the existing asset.
For many operating businesses, this approach may understate the true value because it often fails to capture significant intangible assets like brand reputation or goodwill. Therefore, its result is often considered the minimum value a seller should accept, as it represents the amount that could be realized if the company were liquidated.
Determining a value is only part of the process; substantiating that value with credible documentation is important for tax purposes. Taxpayers must maintain detailed records that show how a Fair Market Value was determined, including lists of comparable sales, financial projections, or detailed schedules of assets and liabilities.
In many situations, the IRS requires a formal appraisal prepared by a qualified appraiser, particularly for noncash charitable contributions. For a claimed deduction of more than $5,000 for a single item or a group of similar items, a qualified appraisal is mandatory. For certain high-value assets, like artwork valued over $20,000, the full appraisal report must be attached to the tax return.
The IRS has specific standards for both the appraiser and the appraisal. A “qualified appraiser” must have earned an appraisal designation from a recognized professional organization or have met minimum education and experience requirements. The “qualified appraisal” document must be prepared no earlier than 60 days before the date of the contribution and must include specific information, such as:
The summary of this qualified appraisal is reported to the IRS on Form 8283, Noncash Charitable Contributions, which must be filed with the tax return. The form requires the signature of the appraiser and an authorized individual from the recipient charitable organization. Failure to provide a required appraisal or to properly complete Form 8283 can result in the disallowance of the charitable deduction.