Accounting Concepts and Practices

Major Companies Behind Infamous Accounting Scandals

Understand the systemic financial misconduct that led to the collapse of major companies and redefined corporate accountability.

The early 2000s marked a tumultuous period for corporate America, characterized by a series of high-profile accounting scandals. Companies engaged in deceptive financial practices, creating a misleading picture of their financial health for investors. These transgressions highlighted a systemic issue where the pursuit of inflated earnings and stock prices overshadowed ethical conduct.

Enron

Enron Corporation, once a leading energy, commodities, and services company, projected rapid growth. This perception masked a deeply rooted and systematic accounting fraud.

The core mechanisms of Enron’s accounting fraud centered on two main practices: the manipulative use of Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) and the deceptive application of mark-to-market accounting. Enron utilized hundreds of SPEs, which were limited partnerships or companies created for specific purposes, to hide massive amounts of debt and inflate earnings. These off-balance-sheet entities allowed Enron to transfer troubled assets and liabilities away from its financial statements, making the company appear more profitable and less indebted. Enron exploited accounting rules by structuring SPEs to retain control while avoiding consolidated financial reporting.

Mark-to-market accounting was misused by Enron to prematurely recognize estimated future profits from long-term contracts as current income. This practice allowed the company to book revenue from deals upon signing, even if the actual cash flow or viability of these contracts was uncertain. When these projections failed, Enron would often transfer the underperforming assets to an SPE, preventing the losses from impacting its own financial statements. This created an illusion of consistent profitability and growth, significantly inflating reported earnings.

Key individuals involved included Chairman and CEO Kenneth Lay, Chief Operating Officer and later CEO Jeffrey Skilling, and Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow. Fastow was instrumental in designing and managing the complex SPE structures, personally benefiting from these arrangements. The scandal came to light through internal warnings, investigative journalism, and a plummeting stock price. Vice President Sherron Watkins sent an anonymous memo to Lay warning of accounting irregularities.

The immediate consequences for Enron were catastrophic. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in December 2001, which was, at the time, the largest corporate bankruptcy in U.S. history. This collapse resulted in billions of dollars in losses for shareholders and employees, many of whom lost their retirement savings. The scandal also led to the dissolution of Arthur Andersen, Enron’s auditing firm, which was found guilty of obstruction of justice for destroying documents related to the Enron audit. This effectively ended Arthur Andersen’s ability to audit public companies.

WorldCom

WorldCom, a prominent telecommunications giant, achieved rapid growth through an aggressive strategy of mergers and acquisitions. The company expanded significantly, becoming the second-largest long-distance telephone company in the United States. This rapid expansion concealed underlying financial vulnerabilities.

The primary method of accounting fraud at WorldCom involved improperly capitalizing operating expenses, particularly “line costs,” which are fees paid to local telephone companies for network access. Instead of expensing these costs, WorldCom executives reclassified them as capital expenditures, or long-term investments. Capitalizing expenses meant they were recorded as assets and depreciated over several years, rather than being fully recognized as an expense in the current period. This manipulation artificially inflated the company’s assets and boosted reported earnings, making WorldCom appear far more profitable. Additionally, the company created fraudulent balance sheet entries and improperly used reserves to reduce expenses and inflate income.

Key executives included founder and CEO Bernard Ebbers, Chief Financial Officer Scott Sullivan, and Controller David Myers. Ebbers pressured subordinates to meet Wall Street expectations, fostering a culture where financial manipulation became acceptable. The fraudulent activities were primarily discovered through the diligent work of the company’s internal audit unit, led by Vice President Cynthia Cooper. Cooper and her team uncovered billions of dollars in questionable transfers from expense accounts to asset accounts, despite facing resistance from senior management.

WorldCom publicly disclosed its accounting irregularities in June 2002, admitting to overstating its income by billions of dollars. The company was forced to undertake massive accounting restatements, ultimately revealing that it had overstated its assets by over $11 billion. WorldCom filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in July 2002, marking the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history at that time. Numerous executives faced legal actions; Bernard Ebbers was convicted of fraud, conspiracy, and filing false documents and sentenced to 25 years in prison, while Scott Sullivan and David Myers also faced charges and received sentences. The scandal resulted in over $180 billion in losses for investors.

Tyco International

Tyco International, a multinational conglomerate with diverse business operations, pursued an aggressive acquisition strategy. This strategy contributed to its rapid growth, but also provided opportunities for financial misconduct. The company’s decentralized structure made effective oversight challenging.

The scandal at Tyco primarily involved egregious executive looting and unapproved financial benefits. CEO Dennis Kozlowski, CFO Mark Swartz, and General Counsel Mark Belnick were implicated in using company funds for personal enrichment. This included unauthorized bonuses, interest-free loans to executives that were never repaid, and the use of corporate funds for lavish personal expenses such as multimillion-dollar homes, extravagant parties, and expensive artwork. These personal expenditures were often disguised as legitimate business expenses.

Beyond executive self-enrichment, questionable accounting practices related to mergers and acquisitions also contributed to the irregularities. Tyco was accused of inflating its operating income by improperly accounting for acquisitions, including undervaluing acquired assets, overvaluing acquired liabilities, and misusing accounting rules concerning purchase accounting reserves. The company also failed to disclose significant executive compensation, indebtedness, and related-party transactions in its financial reports. The misconduct was exposed in 2002 when an investigative report by Businessweek raised questions about Tyco’s accounting practices and executive compensation.

The immediate consequences for Tyco were significant. The company’s stock price plummeted, wiping out billions in shareholder value. Kozlowski resigned as CEO and was subsequently indicted on charges including grand larceny, conspiracy, and securities fraud. Swartz and Belnick also faced charges. Kozlowski and Swartz were ultimately convicted and sentenced to prison, and ordered to pay substantial restitution and fines. Tyco itself underwent a major overhaul, implementing new corporate governance structures and paying millions in fines and settlements.

HealthSouth Corporation

HealthSouth Corporation, a major provider of rehabilitative healthcare services, found itself embroiled in a significant accounting scandal. The company had projected a strong financial image, but this public perception was built upon systematic financial deception.

The core of the accounting fraud at HealthSouth involved a long-running effort to overstate earnings and inflate assets to meet Wall Street expectations. Executives intentionally manipulated various accounts to achieve desired financial results. This included reducing contra-revenue accounts like “contractual adjustments” and decreasing expenses, which directly boosted reported earnings. Correspondingly, false increases were made to assets or decreases to liabilities to balance the ledger. This intricate manipulation involved creating false entries and fabricating supporting documentation. Employees often made numerous small fraudulent entries to avoid auditor detection.

Richard Scrushy, the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, was identified as the central figure in orchestrating the fraud. He allegedly insisted on the systematic overstatement of earnings to meet analyst forecasts and maintain the company’s stock price. Several other executives, including multiple Chief Financial Officers, were involved and later pleaded guilty to charges related to the scheme. The fraud was primarily uncovered through whistleblower accounts and subsequent investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice. Whistleblowers, including former CFO Weston Smith, played a crucial role in exposing the widespread misconduct. The FBI raided HealthSouth’s headquarters in March 2003, signaling the unraveling of the deception.

The immediate consequences for HealthSouth were severe. The SEC filed accounting fraud charges against the company and Scrushy, alleging that earnings had been overstated by at least $1.4 billion since 1999, and assets by over $800 million. Subsequent forensic audits revealed the cumulative overstatement of earnings to be even higher, ranging from $3.8 billion to $4.6 billion. The company’s stock plummeted, and it faced substantial financial restatements, bringing it to the brink of bankruptcy. While Scrushy was acquitted of criminal charges in 2005, he was later convicted on unrelated public corruption charges. Many other HealthSouth executives pleaded guilty and received prison sentences, underscoring individual accountability for the widespread fraud.

Previous

How to Write a Rent Receipt Letter

Back to Accounting Concepts and Practices
Next

What Is a Good Accounts Payable Turnover Ratio?