Is Stock-Based Compensation Tax Deductible?
Understand how a company's tax deduction for stock compensation is linked to an employee's income, differing from the expense on your financial statements.
Understand how a company's tax deduction for stock compensation is linked to an employee's income, differing from the expense on your financial statements.
Stock-based compensation is a method companies use to grant shares or the right to purchase shares to their employees, which helps attract and retain talent by aligning employee and shareholder interests. A key question for businesses is whether these awards are tax deductible. The tax treatment for the company depends entirely on the specific type of equity plan being offered.
The foundation of tax deductibility for stock compensation is a direct link between the employer’s tax benefit and the employee’s tax liability. This principle is governed by Internal Revenue Code Section 83(h), which dictates that a company can claim a tax deduction in the same tax year that the employee recognizes and reports taxable ordinary income from the equity award. The amount of the deduction a company can take is equal to the amount of ordinary income the employee is required to include in their gross income. For example, if an employee exercises a stock option and recognizes $15,000 of ordinary income from the transaction, the company is entitled to a corresponding $15,000 tax deduction in that same year. This event-driven connection, rather than the initial grant of the award, triggers the company’s ability to realize a tax benefit.
Non-qualified stock plans are a common form of equity compensation, and their tax treatment follows the core principle of linking the employer’s deduction to the employee’s income recognition. For Non-Qualified Stock Options (NSOs), the company’s deduction is triggered when the employee exercises the option to purchase shares. The deductible amount is the “spread,” which is the difference between the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the stock on the date of exercise and the strike price the employee pays. If an employee exercises options to buy 100 shares at $10 per share when the stock’s FMV is $50, the employee has $4,000 of ordinary income, and the company can take a $4,000 tax deduction.
With Restricted Stock Units (RSUs), the deduction event occurs when the shares vest and are delivered to the employee. At this point, the employee no longer has a substantial risk of forfeiting the shares, and their value becomes taxable income. The company’s deduction is equal to the FMV of the shares on the vesting date. For instance, if a grant of 200 RSUs vests when the stock price is $60, the employee recognizes $12,000 of income, and the company claims a $12,000 deduction.
Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs) follow a similar rule by default, with the deduction occurring at vesting for the FMV of the shares on that date. An exception arises if the employee makes a Section 83(b) election. This election allows the employee to pay tax on the value of the stock at the grant date, rather than the vesting date. When an employee makes this choice, the company’s deduction is accelerated to the grant date and is fixed at the FMV on that day.
Statutory stock plans, also known as qualified plans, operate under a different set of tax rules where a company deduction is the exception. These plans offer preferential tax treatment to employees, and as a trade-off, the employer generally forfeits its ability to claim a tax deduction.
For Incentive Stock Options (ISOs), the standard rule is that the company receives no tax deduction. This assumes the employee meets specific holding period requirements, which constitutes a “qualifying disposition.” The employee benefits by not recognizing ordinary income at exercise and paying a lower capital gains tax upon selling the stock.
Similarly, for qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plans (ESPPs), the company is generally not entitled to a tax deduction. These plans allow employees to purchase company stock at a discount and provide tax advantages to the employee if holding period requirements are met.
The primary exception for both ISOs and ESPPs is a “disqualifying disposition.” This occurs when an employee sells the stock before satisfying the required holding periods. In this scenario, the employee must recognize a portion of their gain as ordinary income, and the company is then permitted to take a tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the employee reports.
Even when a deduction for stock-based compensation is otherwise allowable, external rules can impose limitations. The most prominent of these is Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m), which applies to publicly traded companies. This provision places a cap on the tax deduction a company can take for compensation paid to its highest-paid executives.
This rule limits the annual deduction for compensation paid to a “covered employee” to $1 million. Covered employees are defined as the company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the next three highest-compensated executive officers. Once an individual becomes a covered employee, they remain so for all future years.
For tax years beginning after 2026, this group will expand to also include the next five highest-compensated employees for the taxable year. Unlike the executive officers, an individual’s status in this additional group is determined annually.
This $1 million cap applies to the total compensation package for any covered employee, including salary, bonuses, and the income recognized from stock-based compensation. For example, if a CEO has a $900,000 salary and exercises NSOs that generate $500,000 of income, the company’s total potential deduction is $1.4 million, but the limitation would cap it at $1 million, causing $400,000 of the deduction to be permanently lost.
A point of confusion for businesses is the difference between the expense recorded on financial statements and the deduction taken on a tax return. For financial accounting purposes, under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, the company must estimate the fair value of stock awards on the grant date. This estimated cost is then recognized as an expense on the income statement gradually over the award’s vesting period.
This accounting treatment contrasts with the tax treatment. The tax deduction is typically a one-time event triggered at a specific point, such as the exercise of an NSO or the vesting of an RSU. The amount of the tax deduction is based on the stock’s value at that later date, not the grant date value used for accounting.
This discrepancy gives rise to a deferred tax asset on the company’s balance sheet. For example, a company might record a book expense of $50,000 in Year 1 and Year 2 for an RSU grant, with a $0 tax deduction in those years. If the award vests in Year 3 with a value of $250,000, the company takes a $250,000 tax deduction in that year. The deferred tax asset recorded in Years 1 and 2 represents the future tax benefit the company anticipates receiving.