Financial Planning and Analysis

Is Manual Underwriting a Bad Sign for Your Loan?

Understand manual underwriting: a thorough, human review for unique loan applications. It's not a bad sign, but a different process.

Manual underwriting assesses a borrower’s financial risk, especially when their situation doesn’t fit standard automated criteria. This process involves a human expert reviewing an applicant’s financial profile. It serves as an alternative to automated systems, offering a nuanced evaluation for unique circumstances.

Defining Manual Underwriting

Manual underwriting involves an underwriter reviewing a loan applicant’s financial situation, credit history, and other factors. This process is distinct from automated underwriting, which relies on algorithms for rapid decisions. While automated systems offer speed, manual underwriting provides a detailed assessment, allowing for judgment and a holistic understanding of the borrower’s capacity to repay.

Underwriters comprehensively evaluate an applicant’s financial life, including income, assets, debts, and credit reports. Their expertise allows for a flexible approach, benefiting applicants whose profiles might otherwise be rejected by rigid automated systems.

Situations Requiring Manual Underwriting

Manual underwriting is necessary when an applicant’s financial profile deviates from standard automated criteria. This includes individuals with non-traditional income sources, such as self-employed individuals with complex tax returns or those with commission-based earnings. For example, if a self-employed person’s income decreased by over 20% in two years, manual review may be required by certain loan types, like FHA loans.

Another reason for manual underwriting is a unique or complex credit history. This can include applicants with a limited credit history, no credit score, or those who have experienced recent bankruptcies or foreclosures. While automated systems might deny such applications, manual underwriters can consider the context and assess the borrower’s current ability to manage finances.

Certain loan types or property characteristics can also trigger a manual review. Jumbo loans, which exceed conforming loan limits, often undergo manual underwriting due to their size and non-standard nature. Applications for government-backed loans, such as FHA, VA, or USDA loans, may require manual underwriting if the applicant does not meet automated thresholds, such as having a credit score below 620 or a debt-to-income (DTI) ratio exceeding 43%.

Key Elements of Manual Underwriting Evaluation

Underwriters thoroughly examine financial and non-financial factors to determine a borrower’s eligibility. Income stability and sustainability are paramount, with underwriters assessing the source, duration, and likelihood of continued income. This often necessitates detailed documentation, such as pay stubs, W-2s, several years of tax returns, and bank statements, especially for self-employed individuals who may also need to provide profit and loss statements.

Asset verification is another critical component, involving a detailed review of savings, investments, and other liquid assets. Underwriters scrutinize bank statements to ensure sufficient funds for down payments and reserves, looking for consistent balances and requiring explanations for any large or unusual deposits not considered regular income. For instance, Fannie Mae typically prefers borrowers to have enough liquid assets to cover several months of mortgage payments.

Beyond just credit scores, manual underwriters analyze credit history within its broader context, seeking to understand the story behind late payments, collections, or past financial hardships. They may request letters of explanation for credit events like bankruptcies or foreclosures and can consider non-traditional credit sources, such as consistent rent, utility, or insurance payments, to establish creditworthiness for those with limited or no credit history.

Underwriters also assess compensating factors, which are positive aspects that can offset perceived weaknesses in an application. These can include:
A larger down payment
Significant cash reserves
Long-term job stability
A low payment shock (where the new mortgage payment is close to the previous housing payment)
A strong history of on-time rent payments
For instance, FHA manual underwriting guidelines allow higher debt-to-income ratios (up to 40% front-end and 50% back-end) if sufficient compensating factors are present.

Navigating the Manual Underwriting Process

When undergoing manual underwriting, applicants should anticipate more direct and extensive communication with the underwriter or loan officer. This personalized review involves detailed conversations to fully understand the financial situation and unique circumstances.

More extensive and detailed documentation is required compared to automated processes. Applicants should provide a wide array of financial records, including multiple years of tax returns, bank statements (up to 12 months), recent pay stubs, and verification of assets. This thorough collection of information allows the underwriter to build a complete financial picture.

The manual underwriting process takes longer than automated approvals due to the in-depth review involved. While automated systems can provide conditional approvals in minutes, a manual review can take days for pre-approval and several weeks for full loan sign-off. This extended timeline is necessary for the underwriter to assess all submitted documents and make an informed decision.

To navigate this process effectively, applicants should provide comprehensive and clear information. Promptly responding to any additional documentation requests or questions helps streamline the process and demonstrates a commitment to the loan application.

Previous

How and Where to Cash a Cashier's Check

Back to Financial Planning and Analysis
Next

Do You Get Money Back From Life Insurance?