How Many Invoices Can One Person Process?
Uncover the variables affecting how many invoices one person can process. Learn key metrics and effective strategies for optimizing efficiency.
Uncover the variables affecting how many invoices one person can process. Learn key metrics and effective strategies for optimizing efficiency.
The number of invoices a single person can process in accounts payable is dynamic, influenced by many factors. Efficient invoice processing is important for a company’s financial health, impacting cash flow, vendor relationships, and operational effectiveness. Understanding these variables optimizes accounts payable operations.
Invoice processing capacity is shaped by automation. Manual processes, involving physical paper and hand data entry, limit throughput compared to automated systems. Automation reduces time on repetitive tasks, allowing individuals to handle more transactions.
Invoice complexity impacts processing speed. Complex invoices with multiple line items, various currencies, or unstructured data require more manual scrutiny. Simpler, standardized electronic invoices with clear PO references process faster. Frequent errors, discrepancies, or missing information requiring investigation significantly slow the process.
Staff experience and training directly impact efficiency. Well-trained personnel familiar with systems, policies, and exceptions navigate the process quickly and accurately.
Internal structure and workflow, including invoice routing and inter-departmental communication, also influence processing times. Streamlined approval hierarchies and clear handoff points contribute to faster processing.
Invoice volume and frequency affect efficiency; high volume allows optimization, while low volume may not justify extensive automation. Technology and software, like ERP systems or AP automation, impact processing speed and accuracy. Different industries present unique demands, with varying invoice complexities and compliance requirements.
Organizations assess invoice processing efficiency using key metrics. One benchmark is invoices processed per Full-Time Equivalent (FTE). This number varies, but industry reports suggest a wide range. Top-performing organizations process tens of thousands annually (40,000-90,000 in automated environments), while manual processes handle only a few thousand. A median for all organizations could be around 833 invoices per FTE per month, or approximately 10,000 annually.
Another metric is cost per invoice, encompassing labor, software, and overhead. Manual processing can cost $15 to $40 per invoice, up to $50 for complex ones. Automation can decrease this cost to $3 or even $1.42 for best-in-class performers. The average cost across organizations typically stands around $9 to $13 per invoice.
Invoice cycle time, from receipt to payment, indicates efficiency. For manual processes, this can range from 7 to 17 days or longer. High-performing organizations, leveraging automation, achieve cycle times as short as 2.8 to 4 days. Shorter cycle times signify efficiency, capture early payment discounts, and maintain positive vendor relationships.
Straight-Through Processing (STP) measures invoices processed without human intervention or exceptions. A higher STP rate indicates a more efficient, automated process, as invoices flow seamlessly from receipt to payment. Best-in-class accounts payable functions often achieve significantly higher STP rates, sometimes exceeding 67%. These metrics guide organizations to benchmark performance and identify improvements, considering business size, industry, and complexity.
Organizations can enhance invoice processing efficiency by embracing technological solutions. Implementing accounts payable (AP) automation software, which may include Robotic Process Automation (RPA) for repetitive tasks and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for data capture, streamlines data entry, invoice matching, and approval workflows. This automation reduces manual effort, minimizes errors, and allows staff to focus on more strategic activities.
Standardizing processes is another strategy. Establishing consistent procedures, using uniform invoice templates, and providing clear guidelines for vendor invoice submissions can reduce variations and exceptions that slow down processing. This includes developing clear internal policies for invoice coding, approval thresholds, and payment scheduling.
Effective vendor management and communication are also beneficial. Working proactively with vendors to encourage electronic invoicing and the use of standardized formats, such as Purchase Order (PO) numbers on all invoices, reduces the likelihood of discrepancies and exceptions upon receipt. This collaboration helps ensure that invoices are accurate and complete from the outset.
Optimizing workflow and approvals involves streamlining internal processes. This can be achieved by implementing digital approval workflows, which route invoices electronically to the appropriate approvers based on predefined rules, and by reducing unnecessary steps. Clear approval hierarchies and automated reminders help prevent bottlenecks and delays.
Continuous training and skill development for accounts payable staff are also beneficial. Equipping employees with the knowledge and skills to effectively use new technologies, understand best practices, and efficiently handle exceptions contributes to overall departmental efficiency. Regular training ensures the team remains proficient and adaptable to evolving processes.
Leveraging data analytics and performance monitoring provides insights into the invoice processing workflow. Tracking metrics such as cost per invoice, cycle time, and error rates can help identify bottlenecks, assess the impact of implemented changes, and pinpoint areas that require further improvement. This data-driven approach allows for ongoing refinement and proactive measures to reduce errors and exceptions, such as robust validation rules and three-way matching (invoice, purchase order, and receiving report) to ensure accuracy before payment.