Five Ways Land Can Depreciate or Lose Value
Uncover the nuanced reasons why land and its associated assets can lose value or depreciate over time.
Uncover the nuanced reasons why land and its associated assets can lose value or depreciate over time.
Land is often perceived as an asset that permanently holds or increases in value, making it a desirable long-term investment. Accounting principles generally support this view, stating that land itself is not a depreciable asset because it possesses an indefinite useful life. Unlike structures or equipment that wear out, land does not physically deteriorate or become obsolete. This means businesses cannot deduct a portion of the land’s cost each year for tax purposes, as they can with other assets.
However, despite this non-depreciable status, the value of land can diminish over time due to various factors. While raw land may not depreciate in the accounting sense, its market value can decline, and certain assets associated with land are subject to depreciation or depletion. Understanding these distinctions is important for property ownership or investment. Land’s value is not static and is influenced by internal characteristics, external forces, and regulatory environments.
While raw land is not depreciable, physical improvements constructed on it are. These include buildings, fences, roads, utility systems, and landscaping. They have a finite useful life and are subject to wear and tear, obsolescence, or deterioration. Taxpayers can recover the cost of these assets through depreciation deductions. For example, a commercial building might be depreciated over 39 years, while residential rental property is typically depreciated over 27.5 years, using methods such as MACRS.
The IRS provides guidance on depreciation in Publication 946. To be depreciable, property must be owned, used in a business or income-producing activity, have a determinable useful life, and be expected to last more than one year. When property is purchased, the total cost must be allocated between the non-depreciable land and the depreciable improvements. This allocation is often based on property tax assessments or appraisals, ensuring that only the value attributable to structures is depreciated.
Land can lose value through the extraction of its finite natural resources, a process called “depletion.” Depletion is an accounting method for natural resources like minerals, oil, gas, and timber. It is similar to depreciation but applies to the gradual exhaustion of reserves as they are removed. As resources are extracted, the land’s inherent value diminishes, and this reduction is recognized as an expense.
Two primary methods calculate depletion: cost depletion and percentage depletion. Cost depletion allocates the resource’s cost over total estimated recoverable units, expensing a portion as units are extracted. Percentage depletion, typically used in the oil and gas industry, calculates a fixed percentage of the gross income from the resource. This accounting treatment ensures businesses accurately reflect the reduced value of their natural resource assets, aligning extraction costs with revenues.
Environmental factors can significantly reduce land value, often due to physical or chemical changes to the land. Contamination from pollutants, hazardous waste, or industrial activities can render land less usable and necessitate costly remediation. For instance, a former industrial site might require extensive cleanup of soil or groundwater before it can be safely developed. Such remediation expenses directly reduce the property’s net value.
Natural disasters, including floods, wildfires, or prolonged droughts, also damage land. These events can permanently alter the land’s topography, soil quality, or water access, making it less suitable for its intended use, such as agriculture or development. Properties in areas prone to recurring environmental hazards may experience decreased demand and lower market values. Even after cleanup, a “remediation stigma” can persist, making financing more difficult and reducing the land’s perceived value.
Economic and market forces can cause land values to decline, even when the land remains physically unchanged. A downturn in the local or regional economy can lead to decreased demand for property, resulting in lower prices. Factors such as job losses, population decline, or a surplus of available land can create an imbalance between supply and demand, pushing values downward. Land value is tied to its highest and best use, which external economic pressures can alter.
Changes in infrastructure can also impact land value. If a major road is rerouted away from a commercial property, or a planned development is canceled, the accessibility and desirability of nearby land may decrease. Shifts in consumer preferences or technological advancements can render a specific location less desirable for its traditional use. For instance, a decline in an industry might reduce demand for industrial land in a specific area. These external market dynamics influence what buyers or investors are willing to pay for land.
Changes in laws, regulations, or legal encumbrances can significantly diminish land value by restricting its utility or development potential. Zoning ordinances dictate how land can be used (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial). An unfavorable zoning change, such as reclassifying commercial land to residential with lower density limits, can reduce its development potential and market value. These regulations also specify building setbacks, height limits, and lot sizes, which impact usability.
New environmental regulations can also limit development or require expensive compliance measures, decreasing land value. For example, stricter wetlands protection laws could prevent construction on portions of a property. Legal encumbrances like easements can grant rights to others over a property, such as utility companies needing access for lines or public access rights. While the landowner retains ownership, these easements restrict full use and can reduce the land’s market appeal and value.