Does Small-Cap Value Outperform the Stock Market?
Explore the evidence on whether a specific investment approach provides superior long-term returns, examining its past performance and underlying dynamics.
Explore the evidence on whether a specific investment approach provides superior long-term returns, examining its past performance and underlying dynamics.
Investing in the stock market involves navigating diverse company segments, each with unique characteristics and potential returns. A common question among investors revolves around whether specific strategies, such as investing in small-capitalization (small-cap) value stocks, can consistently outperform the broader market. This article delves into the historical performance and underlying dynamics of combining smaller companies with those considered undervalued.
“Small-cap” refers to companies with a relatively small market capitalization, which is the total value of a company’s outstanding shares. In the United States, small-cap companies typically have a market capitalization ranging from $250 million to $2 billion, though specific definitions can vary across financial institutions. These companies are generally characterized by their potential for significant growth, but they also tend to exhibit higher volatility and lower liquidity compared to larger, more established firms.
“Value investing” focuses on identifying and purchasing stocks that appear to be trading below their intrinsic worth, based on fundamental analysis. This strategy often involves looking for companies with characteristics such as low price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios, low price-to-book (P/B) ratios, or relatively high dividend yields. Value investors aim to capitalize on market mispricings, believing that a company’s true value will eventually be recognized by the market.
Combining these two concepts creates the “small-cap value” investment style. This approach targets smaller companies that the market may have overlooked or undervalued, seeking a dual potential for growth from their size and a rebound in price as their true worth is recognized. Such companies might be less followed by analysts, creating opportunities for diligent investors to uncover mispriced assets.
Historically, small-cap value stocks have demonstrated a tendency to outperform broader market indexes and other equity segments over long periods. This phenomenon is often attributed to two factors: the “size premium” and the “value premium.” The size premium suggests that smaller companies tend to generate higher returns than larger ones, while the value premium indicates that value stocks generally outperform growth stocks.
Academic studies and market data, extending back decades, support these premiums. For instance, data since June 1927 indicates that US small-cap value stocks have outperformed the S&P 500 over the long term. Other analyses also show significant long-term outperformance of small-cap value compared to large-cap growth, large-cap value, and small-cap growth. One historical analysis reported a compound annual return for small-cap value that significantly surpassed other categories.
This outperformance does not occur uniformly or consistently across all timeframes. Performance can fluctuate significantly over different market cycles, with periods where large-cap or growth stocks may lead. For example, there have been extended periods where small-cap value performance mirrored or even lagged the S&P 500. Despite these cyclical variations, the long-term historical evidence points to a persistent tendency for small-cap value to deliver superior returns.
The historical outperformance of small-cap value stocks can be attributed to several theoretical reasons and market dynamics. One prominent explanation is the concept of a “risk premium.” Small-cap companies often carry higher levels of business risk, greater volatility, and less liquidity. Investors may demand a higher expected return as compensation for undertaking these additional risks, leading to the observed premium.
Behavioral explanations also contribute to this phenomenon. Investor biases, such as overpaying for companies with high growth prospects or reacting excessively to short-term news, can lead to market mispricings. Value investors, by taking a contrarian approach and focusing on fundamentals rather than sentiment, aim to exploit these errors and acquire companies at discounted prices.
Market inefficiencies also play a role in creating opportunities within the small-cap value space. Smaller companies often receive less attention from institutional investors and financial analysts, resulting in less efficient pricing of their stocks. This reduced coverage means publicly available information may not be fully incorporated into their stock prices, providing diligent investors the chance to identify undervalued assets.
For investors considering an allocation to small-cap value stocks, several practical considerations are important. A long-term investment horizon is paramount, as any potential outperformance typically manifests over many years. Short-term market fluctuations can obscure long-term trends, requiring patience and a disciplined approach.
Small-cap value should be viewed as one component within a broadly diversified investment portfolio. Incorporating small-cap value alongside other asset classes and market segments can help manage overall portfolio risk while potentially enhancing long-term returns. This strategy aims to smooth out returns, acknowledging that no single investment category outperforms consistently.
Investors should also be prepared for the inherent volatility associated with small-cap stocks. These companies can experience more significant price swings than large-cap companies, particularly during economic shifts. Small-cap value may underperform during certain economic environments but could rebound strongly in others.