Do NFL Players Have to Pay Taxes in Every State They Play In?
Learn the unique tax complexities NFL players face, from how their income is apportioned across states to the detailed filing requirements for their mobile profession.
Learn the unique tax complexities NFL players face, from how their income is apportioned across states to the detailed filing requirements for their mobile profession.
NFL players, like many highly mobile professionals, face a complex tax landscape that extends beyond federal income taxes. The nature of their profession, involving frequent travel and earning income in various jurisdictions, necessitates compliance with multiple state and local tax regulations. This often means that NFL players do indeed pay taxes in nearly every state where they play, a concept widely known as the “jock tax.” This unique financial reality adds layers of complexity to their earnings and requires specialized tax planning.
States possess the authority to tax income earned within their borders, regardless of an individual’s primary residence. This principle forms the foundation for non-resident income taxation. For an individual, “nexus,” or a sufficient connection for a state to assert taxing authority, is often established by physical presence and the earning of income within that state.
Income earned across multiple jurisdictions is subject to apportionment or allocation. This process determines how much of an individual’s total income is attributable to each state where services were performed. The goal is to fairly distribute the tax burden among the states where income-generating activities occurred.
To prevent individuals from being taxed twice on the same income by different states, a mechanism known as “credit for taxes paid to other states” is generally available. A resident state typically allows a credit for income taxes paid to another state on income that is also taxed by the resident state. This ensures that the overall tax liability is not disproportionately increased due to multi-state earnings.
The “jock tax” describes the income tax levied by states and cities on non-resident athletes who earn money within their jurisdiction. The primary method used by most states to apportion an athlete’s income is the “duty day” method. This method calculates the taxable income in a state by dividing the number of days an athlete performs services in that state by the total number of duty days in the year. The resulting ratio is then applied to the athlete’s total annual income.
Duty days include a wide range of activities beyond just game days. These can encompass practice days, training camp, team meetings, travel days, and even media appearances that are part of their professional obligations. For example, a road game might account for two to three duty days, considering travel and game time. While this method is widely used, slight variations in the definition of a “duty day” or the treatment of specific income types, such as signing bonuses or deferred compensation, can exist among different states.
Income subject to this allocation typically includes base salary, performance bonuses, and other compensation tied to team activities. Endorsement income, however, is generally not subject to the jock tax and is instead taxed in the athlete’s state of residence. This distinction adds another layer of complexity to an athlete’s overall tax picture.
Complying with multi-state tax obligations requires meticulous record-keeping for NFL players. They, or their financial teams, must accurately track every duty day spent in each state throughout the season. This detailed log is essential for correctly calculating the portion of income taxable by each jurisdiction.
Players often need to file numerous state income tax returns, potentially as many as 15 to 20, depending on their team’s schedule and the states they visit. This is in addition to their federal income tax return and any return for their state of residence. The sheer volume of filings underscores the administrative burden involved.
While teams typically withhold income taxes for their home state, players may need to make estimated tax payments to other states where they earn significant income. Incorrect withholding by teams is a common issue, which can lead to underpayment in some states and overpayment in others. Players must proactively manage these payments to avoid penalties and interest. Professional athletes frequently rely on specialized tax advisors and accountants who possess expertise in multi-state taxation and the nuances of the “jock tax” to navigate these complex requirements.