Can You End Up Owing Money on Stocks?
Learn how certain stock trading methods can lead to financial obligations exceeding your initial investment.
Learn how certain stock trading methods can lead to financial obligations exceeding your initial investment.
Many investors believe that when they purchase stocks, their potential loss is limited to the amount they initially invest. This common understanding holds true for straightforward stock purchases in certain account types. However, significant scenarios exist where individuals can find themselves owing more money than their original investment. These situations typically involve advanced trading strategies that introduce leverage or obligations beyond simply owning shares. Understanding these distinctions is important for anyone participating in the stock market.
For most individual investors, buying shares of a company through a standard cash brokerage account represents the most common form of stock ownership. In this scenario, you pay the full price for the shares you acquire. Your financial loss is limited to the amount paid for those shares; if the company’s value drops to zero, your investment becomes worthless, but you will not owe additional funds. This limits risk for direct, fully-paid stock purchases.
This type of account acts like a regular bank account, where you can only spend the money you have deposited. When you buy a stock in a cash account, you own the shares outright. Should the stock price decline, the value of your investment decreases, but your obligation ends there. Since no money is borrowed, there is no debt to repay, regardless of market fluctuations. This makes cash accounts a safe way to engage with the stock market, as your capital at risk is defined by your purchase price.
Borrowing money from a brokerage to purchase securities, known as buying on margin, can significantly increase an investor’s purchasing power but also introduces the risk of owing more than the initial investment. A margin account allows an investor to use existing cash or securities as collateral for a loan from their broker. Regulation T generally permits brokers to lend up to 50% of the purchase price of eligible equity securities. Brokers also charge interest on the borrowed amount.
Should the value of the securities purchased on margin decline, the equity in the account also falls. Equity is the market value of securities minus the amount owed to the brokerage. FINRA rules require investors to maintain a minimum amount of equity, known as the maintenance margin. Many brokerage firms impose higher maintenance requirements.
If the account’s equity drops below this maintenance margin requirement, the brokerage will issue a “margin call,” demanding that the investor deposit additional cash or marginable securities to bring the account back to the required level. Brokers can issue margin calls at any time, and while some may attempt to notify the investor, they are not obligated to do so. If the investor fails to meet the margin call promptly, the brokerage has the right to sell some or all of the securities in the account without prior notification to satisfy the debt. If the forced sale of assets does not cover the borrowed amount plus accrued interest, the investor will owe the remaining balance to the brokerage firm, potentially exceeding their initial investment.
Another scenario where an investor can owe more than their initial capital involves “short selling” stocks. This strategy entails borrowing shares from a broker and immediately selling them on the open market, with the expectation that the stock’s price will fall. The short seller aims to buy back the same number of shares later at a lower price and return them to the lender. Unlike buying a stock, where the maximum loss is limited to the initial investment, short selling carries theoretically unlimited risk.
This unlimited risk arises because there is no cap on how high a stock’s price can rise. If the stock price increases significantly instead of falling, the short seller must still buy back the shares to return them to the lender, potentially at a much higher price than they initially sold them for. For example, if a stock sold short at $50 rises to $100, the short seller loses $50 per share before considering costs. The higher the stock climbs, the greater the loss, which can quickly exceed the collateral initially put up by the investor.
Short selling also requires a margin account, as the borrowed shares represent a loan from the broker. Short sellers are subject to maintenance margin requirements and can face margin calls if the rising stock price erodes the equity in their account. Failure to meet a margin call can lead to the broker forcibly buying back the shares to close the position, often at a substantial loss to the investor. Additionally, short sellers are responsible for any dividends paid on the borrowed shares during the period they are short. SEC and FINRA have rules that govern short selling practices.
Certain high-risk derivative strategies can also expose investors to losses exceeding their initial capital. One such strategy is selling “uncovered” or “naked” call options. When an investor sells a call option, they grant the buyer the right to purchase an underlying asset at a predetermined price (the strike price) before a specific expiration date. In a “covered call,” the seller already owns the underlying stock, limiting their risk. However, a “naked call” involves selling a call option without owning the underlying asset.
The risk associated with selling naked call options is theoretically unlimited. If the price of the underlying stock rises significantly above the strike price, the seller of the naked call is obligated to deliver the shares to the option buyer. Since they do not own the shares, they must purchase them on the open market at the current, higher price to fulfill their obligation, resulting in a loss that can far exceed the premium initially received from selling the option. This can lead to substantial financial obligations.
Futures contracts also present a risk of owing more than the initial investment due to their highly leveraged nature. A futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell an asset at a predetermined price on a future date. While only a small percentage of the contract’s total value is required as an initial margin deposit, market movements can quickly lead to losses that exceed this initial margin. If the market moves against an investor’s futures position, their account value may fall below the maintenance margin, triggering a margin call that requires additional funds. Failure to meet this margin call can result in forced liquidation of the position, and if the proceeds do not cover the losses, the investor remains liable for the deficit.