Can Registered Domestic Partners File Taxes Jointly?
Registered Domestic Partners face unique tax filing complexities due to differing federal and state rules. Learn how to navigate these financial distinctions.
Registered Domestic Partners face unique tax filing complexities due to differing federal and state rules. Learn how to navigate these financial distinctions.
Registered domestic partnerships (RDPs) represent a legal relationship recognized by certain states, offering benefits and responsibilities akin to marriage. The question of whether RDPs can file taxes jointly is complex, primarily due to differing recognition at the federal and state levels. While some states grant RDPs similar filing options as married couples, the federal government maintains a distinct stance. This creates a nuanced landscape for RDPs navigating their tax obligations, requiring careful attention to both federal and state tax laws.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) does not recognize registered domestic partnerships as marriages for federal income tax purposes. Consequently, registered domestic partners cannot file federal income tax returns using the “Married Filing Jointly” or “Married Filing Separately” statuses. This federal non-recognition is a fundamental aspect of tax planning for RDPs.
Registered domestic partners use either “Single” or “Head of Household” as their federal filing status. An individual can file as “Single” if they do not have dependents. The “Head of Household” status may be available if an RDP is unmarried, pays more than half the cost of keeping up a home, and has a qualifying person living with them. A domestic partner cannot be the only qualifying person for this status.
A significant complexity arises for RDPs residing in community property states, which include Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. Even though RDPs file federal returns as unmarried individuals, the IRS respects state community property laws. This means income and deductions acquired during the partnership in these states are considered equally owned by both partners.
RDPs in community property states must split their community income and expenses equally between their individual federal returns, regardless of who earned or paid them. For example, if one partner earns wages, half of those wages are reported on each partner’s separate federal return. To facilitate this allocation, RDPs must use Form 8958, Allocation of Tax Amounts Between Individuals in Community Property States, to report the proper division of income, deductions, and credits.
State income tax filing rules for registered domestic partners often contrast with federal guidelines. Many states that legally recognize domestic partnerships allow or require RDPs to file their state income tax returns using a “married” filing status, such as “Married Filing Jointly” or “Married Filing Separately.” This divergence from federal treatment creates a dual filing requirement for many RDPs.
States like California and Oregon, which have specific laws recognizing domestic partnerships, mandate that RDPs file their state returns as if they were married. In California, RDPs must combine income and deductions from their separate federal returns to complete their state tax return, often requiring the creation of a “mock” federal joint return solely for state filing purposes. This “mock” return is not submitted to the IRS.
For RDPs in community property states, the impact on state filing is notable. While they split community income for federal purposes, state community property laws apply fully to their state returns, leading to a joint state return where all community income is combined. This can result in a substantial difference between their individual federal taxable incomes and their combined state taxable income.
Registered domestic partners in non-community property states that recognize RDPs for state purposes may also have the option to file jointly at the state level. In such cases, the state filing is based on individual income, but a joint status may be permitted if the state law allows it. Some states may require specific adjustments or reconciliation schedules to account for the disparities between federal and state filing statuses, ensuring compliance with both sets of regulations.
Given the distinct federal and state tax filing requirements for registered domestic partners, meticulous record-keeping is important. Maintaining detailed records of all income, expenses, and asset ownership is necessary to accurately allocate items for individual federal returns and consolidate them for state joint returns. This includes documenting wages, investment income, and deductible expenditures.
Estimated tax payments require careful coordination for RDPs. Since income may be split for federal tax calculations, but often earned by one partner, both individuals should consider their share of the tax liability when making quarterly payments (Form 1040-ES). Coordinating these payments helps prevent underpayment penalties for either partner.
The allocation of deductions and credits also requires attention. Itemized deductions, such as mortgage interest or state and local taxes, and various tax credits, like education or child tax credits, must be carefully assigned to each partner’s federal return. These items are then combined for the state joint return, necessitating a clear understanding of what can be claimed by whom at each level.
Consulting with a tax professional experienced in registered domestic partnership tax issues is advisable. The complexities arising from the differing federal and state treatments, especially in community property states, can be substantial. A knowledgeable professional can provide tailored guidance and ensure proper compliance.
Consistency in reporting is crucial. Even with different filing statuses at the federal and state levels, all income and deductions must be reported consistently across both partners’ individual federal returns and their joint state return. This alignment helps avoid discrepancies that could lead to questions from tax authorities.