Can a Partnership Be a Partner in Another Partnership?
A partnership can partner with another in a tiered structure. Learn how this arrangement works and its significant financial and legal consequences.
A partnership can partner with another in a tiered structure. Learn how this arrangement works and its significant financial and legal consequences.
A partnership can be a partner in another partnership, creating a tiered or multi-tiered structure. This arrangement involves at least two levels: a lower-tier partnership (LTP) and an upper-tier partnership (UTP). The UTP holds an ownership interest in the LTP, acting as one of its partners, while the LTP is the entity engaged in active business operations or holding primary investments.
This structure creates a chain of ownership. For example, an individual may be a partner in the UTP, and the UTP itself is a partner in the LTP. The individual partner in the UTP has an indirect interest in the profits, losses, and activities of the LTP.
The relationship is defined by the partnership agreements at each tier. The LTP’s partnership agreement will list the UTP as a partner and define its rights and obligations. Similarly, the UTP’s partnership agreement will outline how the economic results it receives from the LTP are allocated among its own partners. This documentation governs the flow of capital and profits.
One frequent motivation is to facilitate a joint venture between two or more existing firms. Instead of a complex merger, the firms can each become partners in a new UTP, which in turn invests in or operates a new LTP for a specific project. This allows them to share risks and rewards without combining their entire operations.
Investment funds, such as those in private equity or real estate, commonly use this structure. A fund is often organized as a UTP to pool capital from multiple investors. This UTP then invests that capital into one or more LTPs, which might be individual property developments or portfolio companies. This separates investment management functions from the direct operational activities.
Another driver is the desire to isolate business lines or specific assets. A company might place a high-risk venture or a distinct operational division into an LTP. The parent company, acting as the UTP, can then manage its investment in the venture separately from its core business. This separation helps to manage risk and allows for clearer financial reporting.
Tax reporting for a tiered partnership follows the pass-through taxation principles outlined in Subchapter K of the Internal Revenue Code. Partnerships do not pay income tax; instead, income and other tax items flow through to the partners. In a tiered structure, this flow-through process occurs sequentially across each tier.
The process begins with the lower-tier partnership. The LTP calculates its net income, losses, and other tax items for the year and allocates them among its partners, including the UTP. The LTP reports the UTP’s share of these items on a Schedule K-1 (Form 1065), which is provided to the UTP.
The upper-tier partnership takes the information from the Schedule K-1 it received and incorporates it into its own partnership tax return (Form 1065). The UTP combines these items with its own separate income or expenses. It then performs a new allocation, distributing the combined amounts to its own partners on new Schedule K-1s, ensuring the LTP’s financial results are reported on the final tax returns.
Partners must also track tax basis. Partners in the UTP must track their “outside basis,” which is their investment in the UTP. The UTP itself must track its “inside basis,” which includes its investment in the LTP. These basis calculations are adjusted annually for income, losses, and distributions and are necessary to determine the tax consequences of distributions or a sale of a partnership interest.
The liability of partners in a tiered structure is influenced by the type of partnership entity used at each level. Liabilities incurred by the lower-tier partnership can flow upward and impact the assets of the upper-tier partnership. The extent of this exposure depends on whether the partnerships are structured as general partnerships (GPs) or limited partnerships (LPs).
If the UTP is a general partner in the LTP, the UTP is liable for the debts and obligations of the LTP. This means the assets held by the UTP could be at risk to satisfy the LTP’s liabilities.
The liability of the UTP’s individual partners depends on its own structure. If the UTP is a general partnership, its partners are personally liable for the UTP’s obligations, including those that flowed up from the LTP. Conversely, if the UTP is a limited partnership, the limited partners’ liability is confined to the amount of their investment, protecting their personal assets from the debts of either partnership.